July 21, 2024
Mechanistic Interpretability (MI) promises a path toward fully understanding how neural networks make their predictions. Prior work demonstrates that even when trained to perform simple arithmetic, models can implement a variety of algorithms (sometimes concurrently) depending on initialization and hyperparameters. Does this mean neuron-level interpretability techniques have limited applicability? We argue that high-dimensional neural networks can learn lowdimensional representations of their training data that are useful beyond simply making good predictions. Such representations can be understood through the mechanistic interpretability lens and provide insights that are surprisingly faithful to human-derived domain knowledge. This indicates that such approaches to interpretability can be useful for deriving a new understanding of a problem from models trained to solve it. As a case study, we extract nuclear physics concepts by studying models trained to reproduce nuclear data.
Written by
Ouail Kitouni
Niklas Nolte
Samuel Pérez Díaz
Sokratis Trifinopoulos
Mike Williams
Publisher
icml
Research Topics
Core Machine Learning
June 11, 2025
Aaron Foss, Chloe Evans, Sasha Mitts, Koustuv Sinha, Ammar Rizvi, Justine T. Kao
June 11, 2025
June 11, 2025
Florian Bordes, Quentin Garrido, Justine Kao, Adina Williams, Mike Rabbat, Emmanuel Dupoux
June 11, 2025
June 11, 2025
Benno Krojer, Mojtaba Komeili, Candace Ross, Quentin Garrido, Koustuv Sinha, Nicolas Ballas, Mido Assran
June 11, 2025
June 11, 2025
Mido Assran, Adrien Bardes, David Fan, Quentin Garrido, Russell Howes, Mojtaba Komeili, Matthew Muckley, Ammar Rizvi, Claire Roberts, Koustuv Sinha, Artem Zholus, Sergio Arnaud, Abha Gejji, Ada Martin, Francois Robert Hogan, Daniel Dugas, Piotr Bojanowski, Vasil Khalidov, Patrick Labatut, Francisco Massa, Marc Szafraniec, Kapil Krishnakumar, Yong Li, Xiaodong Ma, Sarath Chandar, Franziska Meier, Yann LeCun, Michael Rabbat, Nicolas Ballas
June 11, 2025
Our approach
Latest news
Foundational models